Threat to Kill and Assault – Community Correction Order
Our client was charged with multiple counts of making threats to kill and assault towards his family members. He is a person with a rough history, having served the best part of 25 years in prison and youth detention. Due to the charges, he was at risk of facing more time in gaol.
Tyson Manicolo represented him at the Broadmeadows Magistrates’ Court on charges of:
Despite the client’s prior criminal history, he had two saving graces. First, he was recently given custody of two of his children. Secondly, he was seeing a psychologist on a regular basis and was learning to deal with conflict better.
During the plea, Tyson made a submission to the sentencing magistrate explaining that the latter has the option to either imprison our client or he could give the client an opportunity to demonstrate to the court that he is committed to changing his errant ways. The magistrate agreed with the submissions and deferred our client’s sentence for 3 months. During this time, the client was to continue to work with his psychologist and participate in a men’s behavioural change program.
Before leaving court, the magistrate warned the client that if he did not do any of these by the time he returns for sentencing, he would be sent to gaol for making threats to kill and assault.
When the matter returned 3 months later for sentencing, the client had done everything he was supposed to and an updated report from the psychologist was tendered to the magistrate. The latter was so impressed that he placed the client on a Community Correction Order with only one condition – that the client continue to work with a psychologist. His Honour did not impose any unpaid community work.
- The accused made a threat to the complainant to kill either the complainant or another person.
- The accused intended the complainant to fear that the threat would be carried out or was reckless as to whether or not the complainant would fear that the threat would be carried out.
- The threat was made without a lawful excuse.
Other related case studies:
- Assault, Threats to Kill, Threats to Inflict Serious Injury – Diversion
- Diversion for Threats to Kill and Assault Charges
- Threats to Kill and Unlawful Assault – Dismissed
- Withdrawing Assault and Threat to Kill Charges
- Diversion for Threat to Kill
Admitted to practice in 2016, Tyson has a passion for advocacy and takes pride in helping people understand the law. He ensures that clients are given sound legal advice, a fair trial, and a strategic defence that will lead to the best possible outcome in court.
Know more about Tyson by visiting his profile here.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 26/02/2019