Have you been accused of Possess Property Reasonably Suspected to be Stolen?
If the Police have evidence that you had stolen property in your possession, they may ask you to come in for a Police interview. It is important to see the interview for what it is: an opportunity for the Police to gather further evidence to make a case against you. You may have a reasonable explanation as to why you have stolen property in your possession. You may feel obligated by the setting and the manner of questioning to co-operate with Police. The truth is you don’t know how your truth will be interpreted. If you have a fair explanation we can help you provide this to Police at a later stage once we understand the allegations. You should call us for advice before going to any Police interview.
Pleading Not Guilty
You may have a reasonable defence to the charge. Maybe you bought the property in good faith and had no idea it was stolen. Maybe you found the property and were intending take it to Police to find its rightful owner. We will look at all the evidence in the case against you, take your instructions and advise you on whether contesting the matter is in your best interests. If the matter is to be contested our lawyers are experienced in dealing with the Courts and the Police and can ensure that the right charges are before the Court and the evidence is properly tested. You are innocent until proven guilty and our lawyers work hard to ensure that every person gets a fair outcome.
Maybe you made a mistake that you now regret. Maybe you were just caught doing something bad on your worst day. We are experienced at explaining to the Court the reasons for your offending and the positive aspects of your life that mitigate the harm you may of caused. We will help you gather the appropriate material, character references and organize offence specific counselling to ensure that you get the fairest outcome at sentence. Having good lawyers can make a huge difference to the ultimate outcome of your case and the sentence you end up receiving.
Which court will the case be heard in?
The offence of possessing property reasonably suspected to be stolen is the sort of charge regularly heard in the Magistrates Court.
What is the legal definition of Possess Property Reasonably Suspected to Be Stolen?
- Any person having in his actual possession or conveying in any manner any personal property whatsoever reasonably suspected of being stolen or unlawfully obtained whether in or outside Victoria may be arrested either with or without warrant and brought before a bail justice or the Magistrates’ Court, or may be summoned to appear before the Magistrates’ Court.
- If such person does not in the opinion of the court give a satisfactory account as to how he came by such property he shall be guilty of an offence.
- Upon proof that any property was or had been in the actual possession of such person or under his control and whether or not such person still has possession or control thereof when brought before the court the property shall for the purposes of this section be deemed to be in his actual possession.
- Where a person is charged before the Magistrates’ Court with an offence under this section the court may proceed to hear and determine the matter notwithstanding that it appears from the evidence that the person charged stole or unlawfully obtained the property concerned in a place outside Victoria in circumstances amounting to the commission of a criminal offence in that place.Penalty: Imprisonment for one year.
“Have you been accused of possessing stolen goods?”
Examples of Possess Property Reasonably Suspected to Be Stolen
- A person is seen walking a bicycle down a street in Port Melbourne at 2 am. They do not have a helmet with them or any bicycle lights. A police officer finds the situation to be reasonably suspicious. When questioned, the person says they bought it off a stranger at the local pub.
- A person approaches another person with a vintage car of which there are only 1200 made in the world. The buyer, an avid car enthusiast and trader, purchases the car for a very low price and does not take adequate care when considering the legitimacy of the sale. The car is reported stolen and found in their possession.
The legislation for this offence can be found on section 26 of Summary Offences Act 1966.
Elements of the offence
In essence to prove this charge the Police must show that the accused had in their actual possession or was conveying in any manner any personal property that was reasonably suspected of being stolen or unlawfully obtained. The accused must be proved to have done so needlessly.
Possible defences to this charge could be a claim of right, duress, a factual dispute, the concept of beyond reasonable doubt, honest and reasonable mistake of belief, or a lack of intent.
Questions in cases like this
- Were you possessing or in control of the property?
- Did you have a legitimate excuse for possessing the property?
- Did the police have reasonable grounds for questioning you?
You should ring us and discuss your case if you have been charged. Deciding on whether to plead guilty or not while have major implications for you and should be made after proper discussion with a criminal lawyer.
Maximum penalty for section 26 of the Summary Offences Act 1966
The maximum penalty for Possess Property Reasonably Suspected To Be Stolen (s26 of the Summary Offences Act 1966) is 12 months imprisonment.