Unlawful Assault and Threat to Kill – Accused with Mental Illness
The father made a statement to the police wherein he described that he had been assaulted by our client in the weeks preceding the offence. Our client had a long history of mental illness but did not have a significant criminal history. He had a prior 7 years ago for a motor vehicle offence.
It must be noted that our client was generally cooperative with the police. The complainant, the client’s father, made it clear in his statement that he did not desire for his son be charged, but did want the protection of an intervention order. Our client consented to an intervention order brought by the police against him on behalf of his father. At the time of the court hearing, the client has committed no breaches of the intervention order.
We represented the client at the Ringwood Magistrates’ Court. The charges were:
Although our client’s father preferred that the prosecution discontinue prosecuting, the prosecution could not withdraw the charges based on independent evidence that in their view supported the charges.
The case proceeded as a case conference on the first mention date, and our client’s father attended to support his son. The prosecution was invited to speak to our client’s father to confirm his attitude to the continuation of the prosecution. They had a conference with our client’s father and were able to obtain a better understanding of the marked improvement in the family home environment since the date of the offending.
Further discussions with the prosecutor then occurred, and the possibility of the matter resulting in a diversion was canvassed.
This was a pleasing outcome for a case of Unlawful Assault and Threat to Kill involving an accused with a mental illness, especially as our client had taken significant steps to obtain employment. A finding of guilty for any of the offences he faced would have made the prospect of finding employment much harder.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 04/12/2017