Unauthorised Impairment Of Electronic Communication (Commonwealth)
Have you been accused of Unauthorised Impairment of Electronic Communication?
Police InterviewPrior to speaking to police, whether under arrest and in a formal interview, you should always request to speak to a lawyer. Our expert criminal lawyers are available and will provide you with clear and knowledgeable advice about whether to answer questions put to you by police, or whether it is in your best interests to exercise your right to silence and say ‘no comment’ so as not to harm a potential defence later on.
The police interview does not occur in a vacuum. Anything you tell police either during the interview or afterwards can be used against you if they decide it is helpful for their case.
Pleading Not GuiltyIf you deny an allegation of Unauthorised Impairment of Electronic Communication, you should plead ‘not guilty’ and fight the charge. One of our expert criminal lawyers will analyse the police brief of evidence and identify those elements of the offence that police are unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
Our lawyers work closely with aptly qualified experts who can shed light on re-constructing what may have occurred.
Pleading GuiltyOne of our specialist criminal lawyers will negotiate with prosecutors on your behalf to ensure that not only the charge is made out against you, but that the summary is agreed to. Your lawyer will tell your story to the Court to ensure that you receive the best possible outcome in your particular circumstances. It is important that a Judge know your personal circumstances and why you committed the offence. This insight generally leads to better outcomes.
Examples of Unauthorised Impairment of Electronic Communication (Commonwealth)
- Sending a computer virus to a private organisation’s computer;
- Sending a computer virus to a government organisation’s computer;
What is the legal definition of Unauthorised Impairment of Electronic Communication (Commonwealth)?Section 476.2 of the Act defines ‘unauthorised access’ as:
- access to data held in a computer; or
- modification of data held in a computer; or
- the impairment of electronic communication to or from a computer; or
- the impairment of the reliability, security or operation of any data held on a computer disk, credit card or other device used to store data by electronic means;
LegislationThe legislation for this offence can be found on section 477.3 of Criminal Code Act 1995.
Elements of the offenceThe onus is on the Prosecution to prove the following elements, beyond reasonable doubt:
- the accused caused any unauthorised impairment of electronic communication to or from a computer; and
- the accused knows that the impairment is unauthorised.
“Can the Prosecution prove that you did not have authorisation?”
- Factual dispute;
- The fact that you were authorised;
- Lack of intent; or
Questions in cases like this
- Did you interfere with the computer?
- Did you know that you sent a virus?
- Did you intend to interfere with the computer system?
- Did you have authorisation?
- Did another person force you to send the communication?
The court may impose a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment for Unauthorised Impairment Of Electronic Communication (Commonwealth) (s477.3 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code 1995).