Make A Booking Call Now

Threats to Destroy or Damage Property

Table of Contents

Una Ebsworth

Author: Una Ebsworth

Practice area: fraud offences

Una is a Director at Doogue + George, recognised by Doyle's Guide as a Preeminent Criminal Defence Lawyer in Victoria (2026) and an LIV Accredited Criminal Law Specialist since 2014 with over 15 years of experience in serious indictable matters. Her depth of experience in this area means clients receive accurate, considered advice.

View full profile →

Una authored this content and last revised it for accuracy on 7 August 2026.

What is the offence of Threats to Destroy or Damage Property?

Threats to Destroy or Damage Property is an indictable offence under section 198 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic). It applies where a person makes a threat concerning the destruction of, or damage to, property in circumstances that attract criminal liability under Victorian law.

Key points

  • Legal elements: A threat made without lawful excuse, with intent that the other person would believe it would be carried out.
  • Scope of property: Includes property belonging to another person, jointly owned property, or property where the threatened damage is believed or known to be likely to endanger life.
  • Court jurisdiction: Magistrates’ Court if the property value is under $100,000; County Court if $100,000 or more.

The maximum penalty for Threats to Destroy or Damage Property is level 6 imprisonment (5 years).

Common defences may include duress, factual dispute, lack of intent, or wrongful identification.

Have you been accused of Threats to Destroy or Damage Property? If you have, you should get in contact with us to arrange a conference with one of our experienced criminal defence lawyers. Our lawyers have enormous experience in representing people accused of Threats to Destroy or Damage Property and we can give you strategic advice. 

Police Interview

If the Police believe you have made Threats to Destroy or Damage Property, they will contact you to arrange a Police interview.

threats to destroy or damage property

Police officers are trained investigators and their main purpose for interviewing you is to try to gather evidence to build their case against you. Police officers are skilled in asking you questions in a way to make you look like you are not telling the truth. It is for these reasons, that you must get some advice from one of our lawyers about how to handle the interview process before you speak with the Police. There is no such thing as ‘off the record’, anything you tell a Police officer can appear in a statement if the Police think it helps their case.

You will undoubtedly have some important questions such as:

  • Do I have to answer all questions?
  • Will I look guilty if I say ‘no comment’?
  • Will the Police leave me alone if I answer their questions?

We can also attend the Police station with you and sit in on the interview if you feel more comfortable having someone there on your side. A Police interview can be daunting because it is typically conducted at a Police station with two Police officers.

Your defence begins at the very first interaction you have with Police.

Pleading Not Guilty

If you have been charged with Threats to Destroy or Damage Property, you should get in early to speak with one of our lawyers who can look at the brief of evidence and advise you on your prospects of successfully defending the charge. You want to get in early because there may be time sensitive evidence that needs to be gathered which the Police will overlook. This evidence may undermine the Police case.

The difference our firm offers our clients is that we are pro-active in our approach to representing people. We consider – are there witnesses who the Police have not spoken to? Is there evidence that Police have not gathered? Is there data that needs to be protected?

Our lawyers have achieved many acquittals for people charged with Threats to Destroy or Damage Property.

Pleading Guilty

Our lawyers have represented many people in Court who have decided to plead guilty to Threats to Destroy or Damage Property. The advantage this gives our lawyers is that we know what preparation should be done ahead of Court to get a favourable outcome. Generally speaking, things which lead to a good outcome include:

  • Gathering character references,
  • Writing an apology letter to the victim,
  • Undergoing a relevant course.

The key thing we have discovered after decades of experience is that your preparation before Court is the key to a great outcome. When you attend Court with a bundle of material demonstrating the positive steps you have taken in the lead up to Court, you can deal with anything that is thrown at you in Court.

Sentencing

Sentencing in the higher courts of Victoria

Higher courts sentencing pie chart

Source: Sentencing Advisory Council of Victoria (SACStat), Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 198(a) — 40 charges, higher courts, 1 July 2019 – 30 June 2024.

Sentencing outcome%
Imprisonment80.0%
Fine7.5%
Other7.5%
Community Correction Order5.0%

These statistics indicate a strong likelihood of imprisonment when this offence is dealt with in the higher courts. The distribution reflects the seriousness of cases that proceed to these courts, although the final sentence imposed will always depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case.

Sentencing in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria

Magistrates court sentencing pie chart

Source: Sentencing Advisory Council of Victoria (SACStat), Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 198(a) — 1,318 charges across 1,240 cases, Magistrates’ Court, 1 July 2020 – 30 June 2023.

Sentencing outcome%
Imprisonment35.2%
Adjourned Undertaking23.4%
Community Correction Order22.6%
Fine17.5%
Discharge/Dismissal0.9%
Other0.5%

These figures indicate that imprisonment is a real possibility for this offence, but courts also frequently impose community-based penalties or other non-custodial outcomes depending on the circumstances of the offending and the offender’s background.

Which court will the case be heard in?

Threats to Destroy or Damage Property is the sort of charge regularly heard in the Magistrates’ Court. That is if the value of the property threatened to be damaged or destroyed is less than $100,000 otherwise the charge will be heard in the County Court.

What is the legal definition of Threats to Destroy or Damage Property?

Section 198 of the Crimes Act provides that the threat must be made without lawful excuse for this offence to be made out. The Free Legal Dictionary defines ‘to destroy’ as to completely ruin a structure beyond the possibility of use.

Examples of Threats to Destroy or Damage Property

  • Telling your neighbour that you plan on damaging your ex-partner’s car to put her or him at risk of death;
  • Telling your colleague that you will damage property belonging to your employer, placing other colleagues or members of the public at risk of death.

Legislation

The legislation for this offence can be found on section 198 of Crimes Act 1958.

Elements of the offence

The Police must show that the accused:

  1. made a threat to another person that they would destroy or damage property belonging to that other person, a third party or the accused and another person; or
  2. the accused made a threat to another person that they would destroy or damage property that they believed or knew was likely to endanger the life of that other person or a third person.

Can the police prove that you intended to endanger another person’s life when you made the threats to damage or destroy their property?

Defences

Possible defences to this charge could be duress, a factual dispute, lack of intent or wrongful identification.

Questions a Judge would ask

If this charge was being determined in the County Court before a judge and jury, the judge may ask the jury:

  1. Are you satisfied that the property belonged to another person?
  2. Are you satisfied that the accused intended to endanger the victim’s life when he/she made the threats to destroy or damage their property?

Questions in cases like this

  • Did you make the threats?
  • What words did you say?
  • Did you intend to endanger the victim’s life when you made the threats?

You should call us to discuss your case with one of our experienced lawyers if you have been charged. Deciding on whether to plead guilty or not while have major implications for you and should be made after proper discussion with a criminal lawyer.

Maximum penalty for section 198 of the Crimes Act 1958

The charge of Threats to Destroy or Damage Property (s198 of the Crimes Act 1958) has a maximum penalty of level 6 imprisonment (5 years).

Other important resources

FAQ About Threats to Destroy or Damage Property

No. The offence can apply where a threat is made to another person, even if that person is not the owner of the property. It is sufficient if the threat concerns property belonging to that person, a third party, or jointly owned property, provided the required intention is present.
Yes. The offence covers threats to destroy or damage property belonging to another person, as well as property belonging to a third party. It is not limited to disputes between the accused and the direct owner of the property.
If the value of the property threatened to be destroyed or damaged is less than $100,000, the matter is regularly heard in the Magistrates’ Court. Where the value is $100,000 or more, the charge proceeds in the County Court.
The offence can extend to situations where a person makes a threat to destroy or damage property that they believe or know is likely to endanger the life of another person or a third party. In such cases, the issue of risk to life becomes central to the charge.
In a County Court proceeding, a jury may be required to determine whether the property belonged to another person and whether the accused intended to endanger a person’s life when making the threat. These issues can be critical to the outcome of the case.
Issues that may arise include duress, a factual dispute about what was said or intended, lack of intent that the threat be believed, or wrongful identification of the accused as the person who made the threat.