Court Integrated Support Program for Drug Offences
This is a case study on Court Integrated Support Program for drug offences.
Our client was charged with Traffick Drug of Dependence (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) and Possess Drug of Dependence. The police case was that our client and his associate were observed in a car to be behaving in a manner that subsequently led to the police searching our client’s car, the discovery of a prohibited substance, and their subsequent arrest for questioning. The drug in question (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) was of a quantity that amounted at law to a traffickable quantity.
The prosecution initially relied upon some messages found on our client’s phone which was alleged to establish communication indicative of an intent to sell drugs. Shaun Pascoe represented the client at the Ringwood Magistrates’ Court.
The Traffick Drug of Dependence charge was disputed by our client and through a lengthy process of negotiation with the prosecution, and in the weeks before the matter was to proceed as a contested hearing, this charge was withdrawn. The matter then proceeded as a plea of guilty to a charge of Possess Drug of Dependence.
The magistrate agreed to allow our client to participate in the Court Integrated Support Program (CISP) for the drug offences. CISP is a bail support program whereby participants, as a condition of their ongoing bail, are required to participate in various rehabilitative programs and to attend meetings with their case manager to discuss their progress. Participants are also required to attend a progress meeting with the supervising magistrate once every month.
Our client completed the CISP program over 4 months. His participation was exceptional. He completed a sustained period of rehabilitation and was able to demonstrate his commitment to his continued abstinence from drug use. Once the client had completed the CISP program, his case was finalised. Submissions were directed at the very favourable progress reports that had been prepared by his case manager at each progress mention.
The client received an adjourned undertaking to be of good behaviour. Importantly, this outcome (good behaviour bond) was made without conviction which is an excellent outcome mainly due to the Court Integrated Support Program (CISP) for drug offences.
- The substance in question was a drug of dependence.
- The accused possessed the substance.
Other related case studies:
- Trafficking, Possess Drug of Dependence – Good Behaviour Bond, No Conviction
- Adjourned Undertaking for Possess Drug of Dependence
- Possess Drug of Dependence and Other Charges – Good Behaviour Bond
- Possession of Methamphetamine and Cannabis – Adjourned Undertaking
- Theft – Good Behaviour Bond
He is an experienced criminal law solicitor and works hard to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. Shaun handles indictable and summary criminal offences and is an expert at criminal defence for both contested and non-contested cases.
Visit Shaun's profile to read more about his background and experience.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 26/04/2019