This is a case study on an adjourned undertaking without conviction for Criminal Damage and Unlawful Assault.
Our client was on his way to work for an afternoon shift, with his partner travelling with him, when he was cut off by another road user. Incidents often happen on the road. It is how they are dealt with that is important. On this occasion, mutual hand gestures followed and both parties then pulled to the side of the road.
The client left his car to remonstrate with the other driver. Following a verbal exchange, he returned to his car intending to leave. A loud bang was then heard and felt by our client and his partner. The other driver had retrieved a pole from his car and smashed our client’s back light with it. Angry and feeling protective of his partner, our client again left his car to confront the other driver. The other driver took a swing at him with the pole. Our client punched him twice in the mouth and smashed his passenger mirror, before returning to his car.
Our client and his partner were both shaken by the incident and neither attended work that day. They called 000 and then travelled to the nearest police station to report the incident to the police. He was later arrested and interviewed. He answered all questions put to him by the police including his own actions. Ultimately he was charged with Unlawful Assault and Criminal Damage. The police summary however made no reference to the other driver’s participation in the altercation and no mention at all of the pole.
In discussion with the prosecution, we were able to point out that our client had immediately reported the incident to the police. We emphasised that he had fully co-operated with the police and admitted his part in the altercation, he had evidence of damage to his vehicle by the other driver, and that his partner had been present and witnessed the other driver with the pole.
It was a good outcome because the police ultimately agreed that road rage incidents often do involve participation by both parties and the summary was amended to reflect our client’s instructions. Our client accepted his own part in the incident and that he had had multiple opportunities to walk away.
The client provided excellent character references and letters of support that clearly indicated his behaviour during the incident to be out of character. Having heard the amended police summary, he was sentenced to an adjourned undertaking without conviction for Criminal Damage and Unlawful Assault. The undertaking was for a period of four months and he was also asked to contribute to the court fund.
- The accused applied force to the complainant’s body
- The application of force was intentional or reckless
- The application of force was without lawful justification or excuse
Other related case studies:
- Criminal Damage and Unlawful Assault – Adjourned Undertaking
- Criminal Damage – Diversion
- Criminal Damage and Wilful Damage – Diversion
- Without Conviction for Criminal Damage
- Adjourned Undertaking for Criminal Damage, Other Charges Withdrawn
Admitted to legal practice in 2002, Kate has since been working exclusively in the field of criminal law. She has experience in all Victorian criminal law jurisdictions including in the High Court of Australia.
Know more about Kate by reading her profile here.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 25/09/2018