Make A Booking Call Now

Unlicensed Own Category C or D Longarm or Handgun

Table of Contents

Jon Ross

Author: Jon Ross

Practice area: firearms offences

Jon is a Senior Associate at Doogue + George with over 20 years of exclusive criminal defence experience, including serious violent crime and gang-related matters across London's Magistrates' and Crown Courts. His depth of experience in this area means clients receive accurate, considered advice.

View full profile →

Jon authored this content and last revised it for accuracy on 7 August 2026.

What is the offence of Unlicensed Own Category C or D Longarm or Handgun?

This offence concerns the unauthorised ownership of highly regulated firearms in Victoria, specifically category C or D longarms and general category handguns. These firearm categories are subject to strict licensing controls, and ownership is prohibited unless a person holds the appropriate authority under Victorian firearms law.

Key points

  • Legislation: Section 135(2) of the Firearms Act 1996 (Vic).
  • Elements: Possession of a category C/D longarm or handgun and no licence authorising that possession.
  • Court: As a summary offence, it is normally handled in the Magistrates’ Court.

The maximum penalty for Unlicensed Own Category C or D Longarm or Handgun is A fine of 120 penalty units ($25,092.00 as at 2026–27) or 2 years imprisonment.

Common defences may include Necessity, lack of intent, sudden or extraordinary emergency, incorrect factual matrix, and whether the prosecution proves the charge beyond reasonable doubt.

Have you been accused of Unlicensed Own Category C or D Longarm or Handgun? Legal advice can be the difference between you telling police things which can harm your defence or having charges withdrawn or an acquittal.

Police Interview

From our experience, it is worthwhile for you to get legal advice prior to being interviewed by police for the offence of owning a category C or D longarm or handgun without the required licence. You should contact our office to arrange an appointment with a lawyer.

Rifles on a black background

Often the police interview is the last stage of an investigation and police have already determined that you will be charged with this criminal offence even though they will make it seem this is your opportunity to speak. Anything that is said by you in the interview is recorded and can be used as evidence against you in support of the offence. It is also important to remember that anything you tell police “off the record” will also appear in evidence.

It is important to have legal advice ahead of this process to protect your rights.

Pleading Not Guilty

A well prepared contested hearing is the key to success when pleading not guilty to the offence of owning a category C or D longarm or handgun without the required licence.

Our lawyers conduct their own investigative work when analyzing the issues that are presented in the evidence relied upon by police. We have conducted many contested hearings for persons who elect to plead not guilty to this offence.

Pleading Guilty

Firearms offences are treated very seriously by the courts. It is important for the court to be made aware of your personal circumstances and the circumstances which surrounded the offending when you plead guilty to owning a category C or D longarm or handgun without the required licence.

We regularly appear in pleas of guilty for people charged with this offence and can assist you in obtaining and presenting the most relevant material to the court to achieve a positive sentencing outcome.

Which court will the case be heard in?

As a summary offence, any summons for this charge will normally be handled by the Magistrates’ Court.

What is the legal definition of Unlicensed Own Category C or D Longarm or Handgun?

  1. A person must not own a category C or D longarm or a general category handgun unless that person is authorised by a licence under this Act to possess the firearm.

Penalty: 120 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment.

Examples of Owning a Category C or D Longarm or Handgun

  • Having a category C or D longarm or category in your possession or control without a license.

Elements of the offence

The prosecution must prove:

  • The accused possessed a category C or D longarm or handgun; and
  • The accused did not have a licence authorising possession of the firearm.

Legislation

The legislation for this offence can be found on section 135(2) of the Firearms Act 1996.

Defences

Defences that can be run in response to this charge include necessity, lack of intent, sudden or extraordinary emergency, incorrect factual matrix and the concept of beyond reasonable doubt.

Questions in cases like this

  • What intent can be identified from the circumstances surrounding the matter?
  • Was there an emergency situation?
  • Were you the one in possession or control?

Maximum penalty for section 135(2) of the Firearms Act 1996

The offence of Unlicensed Own Category C or D Longarm or Handgun (s135(2) of the Firearms Act 1996) carries a maximum penalty of a fine of 120 penalty units ($25,092.00 as at 2026–27) or 2 years imprisonment.

Other important resources

FAQ About Unlicensed Own Category C or D Longarm or Handgun

What happens during a police interview for an unlicensed category C or D firearm charge?
A police interview is recorded and forms part of the evidence relied upon in support of the charge. Anything said during the interview can be used in court. Statements believed to be “off the record” may also appear in evidence. Interviews commonly occur after police have already decided that charges will be laid.
Yes. Statements said during the interview process, including those believed to be off the record, can appear in the evidence. Recorded interviews are treated as part of the prosecution brief and may be relied upon in proving the charge.
A central issue is whether the accused was the person in possession or control of the firearm. The surrounding circumstances are assessed to determine who had control and what can be inferred about the situation from those facts.
Intent is identified from the circumstances surrounding the alleged possession or control of the firearm. The facts are examined to determine what state of mind can properly be inferred in relation to the ownership of the firearm.
Sudden or extraordinary emergency is recognised as a potential issue in cases of this nature. Whether such a situation existed is considered in light of the factual circumstances surrounding the alleged possession or control of the firearm.
An incorrect factual matrix involves disputing the version of events relied upon to support the charge. This may include contesting who was in possession or control of the firearm, or challenging the accuracy of the surrounding circumstances said to establish the offence.