Possessing Marketable Quantities of Unlawfully Imported Border Controlled Drugs or Border Controlled Plants

Police Interview

Due to the seriousness of this offence, it is important to seek legal advice from an experienced criminal lawyer before engaging in a police interview. We can assist you by discussing any advantages or disadvantages of engaging in a police interview. Going to a police interview is stressful so it is best to arm yourself with as much knowledge as possible prior to attending. We can also accompany you to the police interview.

Pleading Not Guilty

Just because you have been charged with this offence does not mean you should plead guilty. It is important to speak to an experienced lawyer who can assess all the evidence against you before you enter a plea. We regularly deal with these types of complex matters and can go through this charge and the evidence with you. If you plead not guilty we can develop a strategy for your case and have experienced lawyers represent you in court.

Pleading Guilty

You may decide that the best outcome for you will be pleading guilty to this charge. Given its serious nature and the risk of imprisonment, it is important to engage a lawyer to represent you.

We conduct pleas on behalf of our clients every day. We will be able to assist you in trying to receive the best possible outcome by closely considering the facts of your case, advising you of any programs or counselling to engage in prior to court and collecting other supporting evidence.

Which court will the case be heard in?

This offence is typically dealt with in the County Court of Victoria.

Examples of Possessing Marketable Quantities of Unlawfully Imported Border Controlled Drugs or Border Controlled Plants

• Having a border-controlled substance, such as cannabis, in a suitcase at an airport;
• Having a border-controlled substance, such as cannabis, in a shipping container;

What is the legal definition of Possessing Marketable Quantities of Unlawfully Imported Border Controlled Drugs or Border Controlled Plants?

Section 301.4 of the Criminal Code defines a ‘border-controlled drug’ as:

Section 301.4 of the Criminal Code defines a ‘border controlled plant’ as:

1. listed by a regulation as a border controlled plant; or
2. determined by the AFP Minister as a border controlled plant under section 301.13 (which deals with emergency determinations of serious drugs).

Legislation

The legislation for this offence can be found on section 307.6 of Criminal Code Act 1995.

Elements of the offence

The Prosecution must prove the following elements beyond reasonable doubt to establish this offence:

1. the person possesses a substance; and
2. the substance was unlawfully imported; and
3. the substance is a border-controlled drug or a border-controlled plant; and
4. the quantity possessed is a marketable quantity.

Please note that the burden is on the defence to prove that he/she did not intend to sell the border-controlled substance. 

Can the Prosecution prove that you were in possession of a marketable quantity of a controlled substance? 

13.5 Standard of proof – defence
A legal burden of proof on the defendant must be discharged on the balance of probabilities.

Defences

The following defences are available to a person charged with this offence:

1. Lack of knowledge;
2. The accused did not possess the substance; or
3. There is a factual dispute as to the quantity of the substance imported.

Questions in cases like this

• Were you aware that you were in possession of a marketable quantity of a border-controlled substance?
• Where was the border-controlled substance located?
• What is the quantity of the border-controlled substance?

Questions the Judge Might Ask the Jury

1. Are you satisfied that the amount of border-controlled substance was a marketable quantity?
2. Are you satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that the accused did not intend to sell the border-controlled substance?
3. Are you satisfied that the accused was reckless as to the substance being a border-controlled drug or border controlled plant?
4. Are you satisfied that one drug is a chemical derivative of a listed prohibited drug? It will require expert evidence which will examine matters such as whether one drug can be made from another and whether one drug is structurally related to another (see Daley v Tasmania (2012) 21 Tas R 247; [2012] TASCCA 4; Clegg v Western Australia (No 2) [2017] WASCA 30).¹

You should call us and discuss your case with one of our experienced lawyers if you have been charged. Deciding on whether to plead guilty or not has important implications for you and should be made after proper discussions with a criminal lawyer.

Maximum penalty for section 307.6 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code

Any person found guilty of (s307.6 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code) may be sentenced to a maximum penalty of imprisonment for 25 years or a fine of 5,000 penalty units ($1,045,500 as at 2026-27), or both.

Other important resources

• VCC summaries – federal drug offences: Sentencing decisions from 1 January 2016 to 30 November 2017, arranged by severity of total effective sentence