Make A Booking Call Now

Accessibility of Records for Tax Department

Table of Contents

Bill Doogue

Author: Bill Doogue

Practice area: Tax Offences

Bill is a founding Director of Doogue + George, ranked by Doyle's Guide as a Preeminent Criminal Defence Lawyer in Victoria (2026) and an LIV Accredited Criminal Law Specialist since 1998 with over 30 years of experience in complex criminal and corporate matters. His depth of experience in this area means clients receive accurate, considered advice.

View full profile →

Bill authored this content and last revised it for accuracy on 5th August 2026.

What is the offence of Accessibility of Records for Tax Department?

Accessibility of Records for Tax Department is an offence under section 53 of the Taxation Administration Act 1997. Where a person or corporation is required by a taxation law to keep a record, it must be kept so it can be readily produced to the Commissioner if required.

Key points

  • What must be proved: a required record was not kept so it could be readily produced to the Commissioner when required
  • Type of conduct: failing to keep taxation records accessible for production to the Tax Commissioner
  • Usual court level: Magistrates’ Court

The maximum penalty for Accessibility of Records for Tax Department is 200 penalty units ($41,820) in the case of a body corporate and 40 penalty units ($8,364) in any other case as of 2026-2027.

Common defences may include not required to keep a record; the record was kept and can be easily produced to the Tax Commissioner.

Have you been accused of an offence relating to Accessibility of Records for Tax Department?

ATO Interview

If you are contacted by an ATO officer to attend an interview, you should call us for confidential advice before attending. It is important that you have an expert defence lawyer on your side. We walk you through the process and advise you which questions you must answer, as there are some types of ATO interviews at which it is an offence not to comply and provide answers. There are some privileges which apply and can be called upon depending on the circumstances.

Our lawyers can also attend the interview with you to ensure that your rights are protected throughout the course of the interview.

Legislation

The section that covers this offence is section 53 of the  Taxation Administration Act 1997.

What is the Legal Definition of Accessibility of Records for Tax Department?

Where a person or corporation is required by a taxation law to keep a record, it must be kept so that it is able to be readily produced to the Commissioner, if the Commissioner required its production.

Examples of Accessibility of Records for Tax Department

  • You destroy your records of minor tax related matters from 3 years ago. The Tax Commissioner conducts an audit, and you cannot produce the destroyed records.
  • You retained documents that related to business expenditure; however, they were stored in a location where you cannot access them easily. The Commissioner conducted an audit, and you were not able to produce the documents on account of where they were located. 

Pleading Not Guilty

There are always two sides to a story, and we understand that the prosecution will present evidence that is supportive of their case. They have a high burden to meet and must prove the charges against you beyond reasonable doubt. You are innocent until proven guilty. We have run and won many contested hearings and know what is required to build a strong defence. We will work with you to understand your version of events.

Defences

Possible defence arguments can include that:

  • You were not required to keep a record.
  • You did keep a record, and the record can be easily produced for the Tax Commissioner.

There are other possible defences, depending on the circumstances surrounding the alleged offending. Each matter is unique and requires an individual approach and strategy.

Questions in cases like this

  • How do they prove you had to keep a record?
  • If you kept a record, how do they prove it could not be easily produced?
  • If your record was lost or destroyed, did you take reasonable precautions to prevent losing the record, and was it impossible to get a substitute record?

Pleading Guilty

We understand that nothing happens in a vacuum, and often there is an important context and explanation that underpins offending of this nature. Perhaps you made an honest mistake or were not aware of your obligations when you should have been. Our lawyers are highly skilled at presenting pleas in mitigation. We appear in the Magistrates’ Court on a daily basis and will present your side of the story and your personal circumstances with passion and persuasion to ensure the Court sentences you to the most appropriate option.

Maximum Penalty and Court That Deals With Accessibility of Records for Tax Department

The maximum penalty for breaching the requirement to keep records accessible is 200 penalty units ($41,820) in the case of a body corporate and 40 penalty units ($8,364) in any other case as of 2026-2027.

This is a charge regularly heard in the Magistrates’ Court.

What Can You Be Sentenced to for This Charge?

Your first offence for this charge will likely lead to a moderate fine.

Speak to your lawyer from Doogue + George to see what range of penalties might be available in your matter, including whether submissions can be made to avoid the recording of a conviction.

Other Important Resources

FAQs for Accessibility of Records for Tax Department

What does “readily produced to the Commissioner” mean?
A record must be kept in a way that allows it to be produced to the Commissioner when required. Accessibility can be affected by how and where records are stored. If records exist but cannot be accessed or produced when requested, this may raise an issue under section 53, depending on whether the record was required to be kept and whether it could be readily produced.
The maximum penalty for breaching the requirement to keep records accessible is 200 penalty units ($41,820) in the case of a body corporate and 40 penalty units ($8,364) in any other case. The maximum penalty depends on whether the accused is a body corporate or another person as of 2026-2027.
Yes, if you are charged with accessibility of records for tax department in Victoria, it is vital to seek legal advice. An experienced criminal lawyer can guide you through interviews, evidence, and court appearances.
Yes, charges of accessibility of records for tax department may sometimes be withdrawn before trial if the prosecution evidence is weak. Defence lawyers often negotiate with prosecutors to discontinue weak cases.
Defence arguments may include that the person was not required to keep a record, or that the record was kept and can be easily produced for the Tax Commissioner. Other defences may arise depending on the circumstances, including issues about what was required to be kept and whether the record could, in fact, be readily produced.
Yes, a conviction for accessibility of records for tax department will normally appear on your criminal record in Victoria. Skilled legal representation can help avoid or minimise the impact.
Bail can usually be sought if charged with accessibility of records for tax department. Success depends on the seriousness of the charge and your personal circumstances. Lawyers prepare strong bail applications to maximise release chances.
The length of a accessibility of records for tax department case in Victoria depends on its complexity and whether it goes to trial. Cases may last months or longer, especially if contested in higher courts.
Yes, Doogue + George regularly represent clients charged with accessibility of records for tax department in Melbourne and regional courts. Our team provides expert defence and tailored strategies.
Doogue + George Defence Lawyers have extensive experience with accessibility of records for tax department cases, including high-profile matters. We bring decades of expertise to defending clients in Victoria.