Second Breach of County Court CCO – Fine, CCO Cancelled
Court orders are treated serious by the courts because they are the ones who issue them. A court order such as a Community Corrections Order is seen as an opportunity for someone to prove themselves to a judge or a magistrate. The client was looking at a term of imprisonment unless his story was told in the right way.
Straight off the bat, the judge was not impressed. She informed Jack that a reasonable explanation was vital as she felt that a term of imprisonment was appropriate for a second breach of County Court CCO. Jack knew that the client’s reasons alone were not enough to convince the judge. However he also knew that the client had a story to tell.
First, Jack had to get the judge’s back on his side. He explained that there were some instances where his client had made some attempts at his order. He then spoke about the positive aspects of the client and the latter’s endeavours – like attempts at private rehabilitation for drug use and his continued attempts to find work.
Jack’s client had suffered a shocking hand injury recently however this was not really related to the hearing because it had occurred after he had been charged for his non-compliance. But Jack adeptly made submissions intended to impress the judge. He described how despite not having full movement at the back of the client’s hand, he had still been attempting to do his manual labour work.
- The accused was subject to a Community Corrections Order;
- The accused contravened the order; and
- The accused had no reasonable excuse for contravening the order.
Jack was honed by organisations aimed at providing justice to disadvantaged communities and those that are often over-represented in prisons. These include the Victoria Legal Aid and the North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency (NAAJA) in the Northern Territory.
Admitted to practice in August 2018, Jack also has a Bachelor of Arts with a major in Criminology. Learn more about Jack by reading his profile here.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 25/09/2019