Drive in a Dangerous Manner With Priors for Excessive Speeding
This is a case of Drive in a Dangerous Manner with priors for excessive speeding.
Our client was charged with Drive in a Dangerous Manner (speed dangerous). The charge alleged that our client was driving his vehicle at 209 km/hr in a 100 km/hr speed zone, along a stretch of highway on Eastlink. There were no further aggravating facts (alcohol, drugs, mobile phone use).
Shaun Pascoe represented the client at the Moorabbin Justice Centre for the charge of Exceed Speed Limit.
Our client had prior traffic infringements for excessive speeding. Although Drive in a Dangerous Manner is one of the most serious offences under the Road Safety Act – and is the relevant priors our client had for previous speeding offences – the magistrate was persuaded to contain the penalty to a fine and imposed a period of 18 months license disqualification.
The offence of Drive in a Dangerous Manner is an offence which attracts imprisonment. Were it not for the impressive plea material presented, our client was at risk of far more severe penalties.
Upon our recommendation, our client completed the Road Trauma Awareness course and had obtained several impressive testimonials from family and friends which demonstrated his responsibility in other spheres of his life. Submissions were also directed at what our client had learnt from his participation in the Road Trauma Awareness course, particularly the insight he had developed into his own behaviour behind the wheel.
Our client was fined $1,500 and his license disqualified for 18 months. This was a good result especially considering that the charge of Drive in a Dangerous Manner involved priors for excessive speeding.
He is an experienced criminal law solicitor and works hard to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. Shaun handles indictable and summary criminal offences and is an expert at criminal defence for both contested and non-contested cases.
Visit Shaun's profile to read more about his background and experience.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 20/11/2017