We provided legal representation for the accused at the Heidelberg Magistrates’ Court.
We tendered material at our client’s diversion hearing which demonstrated that our client had engaged in a course of psychological counselling in the period after his arrest. The client also had an excellent employment history and several testimonials were indicative of the offending being out of character.
Through the case conference processing, a prosecutor was persuaded that it was entirely proper for our client to be given the opportunity to avoid a criminal history.
- The accused appropriated property belonging to another;
- The accused did so with the intention of permanently depriving the other of the property; and
- The accused acted dishonestly.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 10/08/2018