Community Corrections Order for Centrelink Fraud

Centrelink FraudThis is a case of Centrelink Fraud resulting in a Community Corrections Order.

Our client was charged with obtaining a financial advantage from the Commonwealth in relation to social security payments. The quantum was not insignificant and was alleged to have occurred over several years.

Hester Kelly acted on the client’s behalf at the Neighbourhood Justice Centre on the charge of Centrelink Fraud.

Custodial sentences are common in relation to social security offences, even for first time offenders. Regularly, in courts around Australia, people receive jail terms for this type of offending.

After making submissions to the court, the client ultimately received a Community Corrections Order with mental health and treatment hours only. She was also ordered to repay the Commonwealth. This result was achieved through careful preparation of references, obtaining medical material, and then finally advocating for the client in court by highlighting the client’s personal circumstances.

Furthermore, the Magistrate appreciated the client’s efforts to repay the overpaid money.

A Community Corrections Order for Centrelink Fraud is certainly an excellent result as it means that the client would avoid a custodial sentence.

 


Hester KellyHester Kelly

Hester is based at our Melbourne office and was admitted to practice in 2014. She previously worked as an Associate to Judge Howard in the County Court of Victoria and was also a solicitor advocate at another Melbourne criminal law firm before becoming a member of Doogue + George.

Hester graduated with First Class Honours in Law in 2012 from Monash University, with a degree in Bachelor of Arts / Bachelor of Laws. She completed two internships at the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law and has volunteered with the HIV/Aids Legal Centre in Melbourne.

Visit this page to know more about Hester.
 


DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 29/01/2018