Make A Booking Call Now

Destroy, Damage or in Any Way Interfere With Any Works of a Water Corporation

Table of Contents

Andrew George

Author: Andrew George

Practice area: Public Order

Andrew is a founding Director of Doogue + George, ranked by Doyle's Guide as a Leading Criminal Defence Lawyer in Victoria (2026) and an LIV Accredited Criminal Law Specialist since 1995 with over 30 years of experience across all Victorian courts, tribunals and Royal Commissions. His depth of experience in this area means clients receive accurate, considered advice.

View full profile →

Andrew authored this content and last revised it for accuracy on 5th August 2026.

What is the offence of Damage Works of a Water Corporation?

The offence of damaging works of a water corporation is set out in section 288(1) of the Water Act 1989 (Vic). It involves serious interference with water infrastructure or property belonging to, or controlled by, a water corporation and carries significant criminal penalties.

Key points

  • The prosecution must prove interference with works or property of a water corporation.
  • The conduct can include destroying, damaging, removing, altering, or otherwise interfering with those works.
  • Usual court level: Magistrates’ Court.

The maximum penalty for Damage Works of a Water Corporation is 10 years’ imprisonment or 1200 penalty units ($250,920 — as at 2026–27), or both, for an individual, and 6000 penalty units ($1,254,600 — as at 2026–27) for a body corporate.

Common defences may include lack of intent, reasonable mistake of belief, necessity, sudden or extraordinary emergency, or a factual dispute.

Have you been accused of Destroy, Damage or in Any Way Interfere With Any Works of a Water Corporation?

Police Interview

If you have been arrested for Destroy, Damage or in Any Way Interfere With Any Works of a Water Corporation, or if you know that police want to interview you about the offence, you must get legal assistance. Your lawyer will provide you with clear legal advice about the interview process and how you should handle the questions. There are some instances where providing a comment can be beneficial and other times when it’s not.

You will have important questions about the interview, such as:

  • Do I need to go to the interview?
  • Should I answer the questions?
  • How should I dress?

Our lawyers can answer these important questions and any others.

Pleading Not Guilty

If you have received a summons for an offence such as Destroy, Damage or in Any Way Interfere With Any Works of a Water Corporation, you may also have been served with a bundle of other documents made up of witness statements, expert reports and photographs. This is called the preliminary police brief.

It is important to seek advice from an experienced criminal lawyer when charged with any offence, and this is particularly so in relation to this type of offence. Your criminal lawyer will assess the strength of the police brief, request any outstanding material, analyse forensic material, and of course assist you to defend the charge.

Pleading Guilty

Pleading guilty to Destroy, Damage or in Any Way Interfere With Any Works of a Water Corporation essentially means that that you accept responsibility for your behaviour and the summary of facts.

One of our lawyers can represent you on a plea of guilty and devise a plea strategy for you such as paying back in compensation for repair works. By doing the ground-work, you will ensure to get the relevant discounts which apply and a sensible outcome.

Which court will the case be heard in?

This charge is a summary matter and is dealt with in the Magistrates’ Court. Whether you should contest or enter a plea of guilty to the court depends on the circumstances of the allegations against you. Contact one of our lawyers as soon as you are charged to discuss your prospects of successfully contesting your charges.

Elements of the offence

As this is a criminal offence, the burden is on the Prosecution to prove the following offences beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. That an accused destroyed, damaged, removed, altered or in any way interfered, with any works or other property, whether real or personal property; and
  2. The property belongs to, or is under the control and management of, a water corporation authority.

Examples of Destroy, Damage or in Any Way Interfere with Any Works of a Water Corporation

  • Damaging a water pipe
  • Interfering with a fire hydrant
  • Deliberately damaging a fire hydrant

Legislation

The legislation for this offence is section 288(1) of the Water Act 1989.

Defences

The following defence are available to a person charged with this offence:

  • Reasonable mistake of belief
  • Necessity
  • Lack of intent
  • Sudden or extraordinary emergency
  • Factual dispute

Questions in cases like this

  • Did you have permission to interfere with the hydrant?
  • Was it in fact you who damaged the water pipe?
  • Is the property damaged?

Maximum penalty and court that deals with this charge

The maximum penalty a Court can impose for the offence of Destroy, Damage or in Any Way Interfere with Any Works of a Water Corporation (s288(1) of the Water Act 1989) is a fine of 1200 penalty units ($250,920 — as at 2026–27) or 10 years imprisonment.

In the case of a body corporate, the maximum penalty stands to be 6000 penalty units ($1,254,600 — as at 2026–27).

These penalties reflect the seriousness of this offence.

FAQs for Destroy, Damage or in Any Way Interfere with Any Works of a Water Corporation

A charge can arise where a person destroys, damages, removes, alters, or otherwise interferes with infrastructure or property connected to a water corporation. The conduct may be physical damage or another form of interference and can occur through intentional, knowing, or reckless behaviour.
No. The offence is not limited to permanent or irreparable damage. Temporary damage, partial destruction, or interference that disrupts the function or use of water corporation works may be sufficient, depending on the nature of the conduct and its impact.
An accidental act may still result in a charge if the prosecution can establish recklessness. This involves awareness of a substantial risk that the conduct could interfere with water corporation works and proceeding despite that risk.
Yes. The offence applies to both individuals and body corporates. Companies face significantly higher maximum fines, reflecting the increased capacity of corporate entities to cause large-scale or systemic damage to essential infrastructure.
Commonly disputed issues include whether the property was under the control of a water corporation, whether the accused’s conduct amounted to interference, and whether the required mental state—such as intention or recklessness—can be proven.
Yes, a conviction for destroy, damage or in any way interfere with any works of a water corporation will normally appear on your criminal record in Melbourne. Skilled legal representation can help avoid or minimise the impact.
Bail can usually be sought if charged with destroy, damage or in any way interfere with any works of a water corporation. Success depends on the seriousness of the charge and your personal circumstances. Lawyers prepare strong bail applications to maximise release chances.
Yes, Doogue + George regularly represent clients charged with destroy, damage or in any way interfere with any works of a water corporation in Melbourne and regional courts. Our team provides expert defence and tailored strategies.