Theft and Making a Threat to Kill
Jack Parsons represented the client at the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court. The charges against the client were:
- Resisting Arrest
- Refuse to Give Name and Address to Members of the Police Force
- Assaulting or Resisting Constables
Offences involving the mistreatment of police officers or any emergency worker on or off duty are extremely serious. However for this case, Jack successfully secured a sentence of diversion for the charges of assaulting police officers and resisting arrest. Factors that contributed to this sentence are that the client did not have any prior criminal history, worked full time, and was having difficulties with alcoholism and mental health. Jack advised the client that an independent forensic assessment from a psychologist may be a compelling piece of material to present to the court. This would assist in contextualising the incident as being isolated. It would also help the case by showing the court further insight into the client’s mental health and alcohol issues. Jack also reached out to the arresting officer. He had a frank discussion about some of the client’s personal struggles and suggested that diversion may be an appropriate source of action. As previously mentioned, offending against police officers is treated very seriously and spitting on an officer is simply not acceptable behaviour. However Jack was able to carefully craft and present the client’s instructions alongside extra support of the psychological document.
The court ultimately imposed a good behaviour bond with a number of conditions for the client to complete.
Hester graduated with First Class Honours in Law in 2012 from Monash University, with a degree in Bachelor of Arts / Bachelor of Laws. She completed two internships at the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law and has volunteered with the HIV/Aids Legal Centre in Melbourne.
Visit this page to know more about Hester.
DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 24/04/2018