Call (03) 9670 5111

Fail to Comply with Requirement to Furnish Form x 2 – Good Behaviour Bond

The client was charged with 2 offences of failing to lodge tax returns for 2 separate financial years (contrary to 8C(1)(a) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953).

The client instructed that he wanted to avoid a conviction for the offences. The only sentencing outcome under the commonwealth sentencing regime (the Crimes Act (cth)), is a 19B bond (good behaviour bond).

Despite the existence of factors which would ordinarily militate against the recording of a conviction, the practice frequently adopted by the Courts for offences of this nature, is to deter others in the community from like offending, and thus record a conviction.

The circumstances as to why the tax returns were not lodged, in this case, were unusual and in both instances there was nil tax payable on the return.

Shaun Pascoe represented our client at the Heidelberg Magistrates’ Court.

The Court accepted the contention that the client had made attempts to rectify his tax situation and there was argument as to whether he had been properly notified before the service of the final notice.

The client had excellent work history, and no relevant priors for taxation offences.

The presiding Magistrate imposed, without conviction a good behaviour bond.

 


Shaun PascoeShaun Pascoe

Shaun is an Accredited Criminal Law Specialist and a partner of the firm. Shaun runs the Heidelberg branch of Doogue + George.

He is an experienced criminal law solicitor and works hard to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. Shaun handles indictable and summary criminal offences and is an expert at criminal defence for both contested and non-contested cases.

Visit Shaun's profile to read more about his background and experience. You can also find him on Google+.

DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 25/02/2013