ANZ Bank facing cartel prosecution

Share This Article

Andrew GeorgeThe article ANZ Bank facing cartel prosecution is written by Andrew George, Director, Accredited Criminal Law Specialist, Doogue + George Defence Lawyers.

Andrew has over 25 years of experience as a criminal defence lawyer. He has appeared in all Victorian criminal courts, various tribunals, and at Royal Commissions. He also practises international criminal law representing clients with interests overseas.

Andrew has been an accredited criminal law specialist ever since 1995. He has lived and worked in Papua New Guinea assisting in the establishment of that country’s first community legal service. He also represented an accused person in IBAC’s first major prosecution, Operation Fitzroy.

BuildingsIn the Age today, there was an article about the ANZ Bank and ANZ Group Treasurer Rick Moscati being charged for being “knowingly concerned in alleged cartel conduct” in relation to a 2015 capital raising.

ANZ Bank said it would defend itself against the action. ANZ chief risk officer Kevin Corbally has said that “[ANZ Bank believes] ANZ acted in accordance with the law…and on that basis the bank intends to defend both the company and our employee.”

When a company raises capital by issuing shares, investment banks or brokers ordinarily act as “underwriters”. This means that they guarantee some proportion of the shares will be purchased at a certain price.

ANZ has said that the action against it related to an “arrangement or understanding” allegedly made between the joint lead managers in relation to the supply of ANZ shares. ACCC chairman Rod Sims has said that “[the] charges will involve alleged cartel arrangements to trading in ANZ shares following an ANZ institutional share placement in August 2015.”

What is a cartel prosecution?

The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 prohibits cartels under civil law and makes it a criminal offence for businesses and individuals to participate in a cartel.

A cartel prosecution is where corporations or individuals are prosecuted under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 for engaging in cartel activity.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has extensive powers to investigate cartels. The ACCC refers serious cartel conduct to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) for prosecution wherever possible.

On 15 August 2014, the ACCC and CDPP signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) addressing serious cartel conduct. Under the MoU, the ACCC is responsible for investigating cartel conduct, managing the immunity process and referral of serious cartel conduct to the CDPP for consideration for prosecution. The CDPP is responsible for prosecuting these offences against Commonwealth law.

Sections 45AF (making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision) and s 45AG (giving effect to a cartel provision) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 make it an offence to engage in cartel conduct.
Section 79 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 contains the penalties for contravention of section 45AF or 45AG.

A person who is found guilty of cartel conduct could face up to 10 years in jail and/or fines of up to $420,000 per criminal cartel offence. It is illegal for a corporation to indemnify its officers against legal costs or any financial penalty.

For corporations, the maximum fine for each cartel offence will be the greater of:

  • $10,000,000; or
  • Three times the total value of the benefits obtained by one or more persons that are reasonably attributable to the offence. Where benefits cannot be fully determined, 10 per cent of the annual turnover of the company (including related corporate bodies) in the preceding 12 months.

What needs to be established for a charge of cartel prosecution to be successful

For a cartel prosecution to be successful, the prosecution must prove that a corporation or individual has made and/or given effect to a contract arrangement or understanding that contains a cartel provision.
Section 45AA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 defines a cartel provision as a provision relating to:

  1. Price fixing; or
  2. Restricting outputs of production and supply chain; or
  3. Allocating customers, suppliers or territories; or
  4. Bid rigging.

Price fixing is when competitors agree on a pricing structure rather than competing against each other.
Allocating customers, suppliers or territories is when competitors divide a market so that they are sheltered from competition.

Bid rigging occurs when suppliers communicate before lodging bids so that they agree among themselves who will win the bid and for what price.

Restricting outputs of production and supply chain is where competitors agree to regulate/limit the amount of goods and services available to buyers.

The prosecution can successfully prosecute a corporation or individual for cartel conduct if they can prove that a corporation or individual has made or given effect to a contract agreement or understanding that contains any of the provisions outlined in section 45AA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

These are serious charges and should be discussed with a firm who handle complex prosecutions as soon as you become aware that charges or an interview are pending.

There are a number of steps in terms of securing evidence (either physical or from a witness) that you would consider doing immediately to take the narrative back from any prosecuting agency.

It is somewhat of a cliché but very true that preparation plus opportunity equals success. You need to put the work in to get the result you need to occur.
Date Published: 1 June 2018

Share This Article