Unauthorised Modification of Data to Cause Impairment (Commonwealth)
– section 477.2 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code 1995
Examples of Unauthorised Modification of Data to Cause Impairment (Commonwealth)
- Sending a virus to a government body’s computer intending to cause an impairment.
Questions in cases like this
- Did you have authority to modify the data?
- Did you intend to cause an impairment to the data system?
- Did you in fact modify data?
- Did your modification cause the impairment?
What are some of the possible defences to Unauthorised Modification of Data to Cause Impairment (Commonwealth)?
Defences to this charge can include can include a factual dispute, the fact that the accused was authorised, or a lack of intent.
You should call us and discuss your case with one of our criminal defence lawyers if you have been charged. Deciding on whether to plead guilty or not has huge implications for you and should be made after proper discussions with a criminal lawyer.
Maximum penalty and court that deals with this charge
This offence carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment.
This offence is heard in the County Court before a judge and jury.
What is the legal definition of Unauthorised Modification of Data to Cause Impairment (Commonwealth)?
Section 308A of the Commonwealth Code defines ‘modification’ of data as deleting and/or removing data.
The legislation for this offence can be found on section 477.2 of Criminal Code Act 1995.
Elements of the offence
To prove this charge the Prosecution must show that the accused:
- caused a modification of data held in a computer,
- that the accused knew the modification was unauthorised,
“Can the Prosecution prove that the modification was unauthorised?”
- that the accused intended to or was reckless as to impairing access to or impairing the reliability, security or operation of any data held in a computer,
- The data that is modified must either be held in a Commonwealth computer or held on behalf of the Commonwealth in a computer.