Make A Booking Call Now

Money Laundering

Table of Contents

Bill Doogue

Author: Bill Doogue

Practice area: white collar offences

Bill is a founding Director of Doogue + George, ranked by Doyle's Guide as a Preeminent Criminal Defence Lawyer in Victoria (2026) and an LIV Accredited Criminal Law Specialist since 1998 with over 30 years of experience in complex criminal and corporate matters. His depth of experience in this area means clients receive accurate, considered advice.

View full profile →

Bill authored this content and last revised it for accuracy on 6 August 2026.

What is the offence of Money Laundering?

Money laundering is a serious financial crime involving dealings with money or property that is derived from criminal activity. Australian law criminalises conduct that allows proceeds of crime to be handled, moved, or used in ways connected to unlawful activity, with offences existing under both Commonwealth and Victorian legislation.

Key points

  • Nature of the offence: Involves dealing with money or property connected to criminal conduct.
  • Relevant legislation: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth); Crimes Act 1958 (Vic); Confiscation Act 1997 (Vic).
  • Where cases are heard: Proceedings commence in the Magistrates’ Court and may be dealt with in the County Court depending on seriousness.

The maximum penalty for Money Laundering is Up to 25 years’ imprisonment under Commonwealth law, with significant fines also available.

Common defences may include Lack of knowledge that the money or property was the proceeds of crime, absence of intent, establishing a lawful source of funds, or issues with the admissibility of evidence.

Not all movement of money that is misunderstood is in fact evidence of money laundering. We are involved in cases involving allegations of significant amounts of money laundering. It is always important from the start to remember that an allegation is just that – an allegation. The Police or an Agency saying something happened is just their interpretation of the data and they often get it wrong.

Allegations range from very simple activities such as small cash purchases through to complex schemes involving multiple participants.

Bag of Money

What is Money Laundering?

An allegation of money laundering generally involves concealing the criminal origin of the illicit funds and enabling the funds to be reintroduced into the legitimate financial system. The methodology can range from very simple cash transactions through to complex financial transactions transferring the funds between accounts, investing in assets, or using ‘shell’ companies as the way of obscuring the origins.

Commonwealth Financial Crime Laws

The Commonwealth Criminal Code Act outlines various financial related crimes which can be prosecuted including:

  • Proceeds of Crime (Criminal Code Act 1995): Under Sections 400.3 and 400.4 of the Criminal Code Act, individuals can be charged with money laundering for engaging in transactions that conceal or disguise the nature, location, or source of criminally obtained money. Penalties can include up to 25 years in prison.
  • Tax Evasion (Criminal Code Act 1995 / Taxation Administration Act 1953):  Charges under Section 8C of the Taxation Administration Act relate to fraudulent actions to evade tax obligations. This can include falsifying records or providing false information to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Penalties include significant fines and imprisonment.
  • Corporate Fraud (Criminal Code Act 1995):  Sections 136 and 137 cover various forms of corporate fraud, such as making false or misleading statements in financial reports or manipulating financial records. NOTE: division 104 is about control orders for terrorism and related offences.
  • Insider Trading (Corporations Act 2001):  Under Sections 1043A, individuals can be charged with insider trading for buying or selling securities based on non-public, material information. Penalties for insider trading can include substantial fines and up to 15 years in prison. NOTE: s 1043L is about compensation under s1317HA.
  • False Accounting (Criminal Code Act 1995):  Sections 490.1 and 490.2 deal with false accounting, which involves falsifying financial statements or records to mislead or deceive. This can result in significant fines and imprisonment.

Under Commonwealth legislation, the maximum penalties can reach up to 25 years in prison. Additionally, significant fines can be imposed, which may reach millions of dollars, depending on the severity and scale of the crime.

The Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) (AML/CTF Act) also imposes stringent obligations on various entities to prevent and detect money laundering. These obligations vary from maintaining relevant policies to keeping records for 7 years and having periodic audits.

Businesses must adhere to stringent customer due diligence requirements, report suspicious transactions to Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), and maintain detailed transaction records. AUSTRAC’s purpose is to monitor compliance with and enforcement of the AML/CTF Act.

International Compliance

From a criminal defence lawyer’s viewpoint, international cooperation in money laundering cases presents both challenges and opportunities. Australia’s active engagement with global partners, including its role in the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and its collaboration with other countries through AUSTRAC, means that money laundering investigations can involve complex, cross-border elements.

Australia has information-sharing agreements and mutual legal assistance treaties which can further complicate defence strategies. For instance, evidence gathered overseas may be used in Australian courts, and the legal processes for obtaining this evidence can be intricate. Alternatively, these involved processes can mean that any misstep or inconsistency in a case might be scrutinised more heavily.

However, international cooperation also offers opportunities for defence. It requires stringent adherence to legal protocols, which can sometimes reveal procedural errors or breaches of rights. Understanding these international frameworks and effectively identifying issues can be crucial in challenging the prosecution’s case and ensuring a fair trial for the accused.

Victorian Financial Crime Laws

Each state will have their own laws concerning financial crimes. The Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) includes provisions related to the proceeds of crime, which can be relevant in money laundering cases. It addresses offences such as:

  • Obtaining property or financial advantage by deception (Crimes Act 1958):  Sections 81 and 82 of the Crimes Act 1958 cover fraud offences, including obtaining property or financial advantage by deception. This can involve falsifying documents, misrepresenting facts, or using deceitful schemes to gain monetary benefits. Penalties can include significant fines and imprisonment.
  • Theft (Crimes Act 1958):  Under Sections 72, 73 and 74, theft involves the unlawful taking of property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it. This includes stealing money or valuables through deceitful means or without the owner’s consent.
  • False Accounting (Crimes Act 1958):  Sections 83 and 83A address false accounting, including falsifying financial records or statements to deceive or mislead. These charges apply to those who manipulate accounts or falsify records to commit fraud or evade detection.
  • Proceeds of Crime (Crimes Act 1958 and Confiscation Act 1997): It is a crime under sections 194, 195 and 195A of the Crimes Act 1958 to deal with property that is the proceeds of crime or subsequently became an instrument of crime. The Confiscation Act 1997 allows for the seizure and forfeiture of assets derived from criminal activities.
  • Forgery (Crimes Act 1958):  Sections 80 and 82 cover forgery offences, including the creation or alteration of documents with the intent to deceive. This can involve falsifying financial documents, signatures, or other important papers for personal gain.

The Confiscation Act 1997 (Vic) also provides for the confiscation of assets obtained through criminal activity. This Act allows for the seizure of assets that are believed to be the proceeds of crime, even if the owner has not been convicted of a criminal offence and both civil and criminal forfeiture processes which provide the State to recover assets through legal proceedings.

In Victoria, penalties for these offences can include up to 20 years imprisonment and substantial fines.

The Confiscation Act  also allows for the forfeiture of assets derived from criminal activities, otherwise referred to as ‘forfeiture orders’.

Police Interview

It is important to speak to an experienced lawyer prior to attending a police interview. The manner in which you participate in the interview can have a significant bearing on the future conduct of the matter. It is important to remember that police interviews and the investigation stage of proceedings are not designed to give you an opportunity to explain your version of events; they are an opportunity for police to gather evidence from you with the intention of laying charges. Money laundering and like financial crime charges are often very intricate and complicated. Caution must be exercised when interacting with police at this important investigative stage.

Pre-Charge Investigation

As criminal defence lawyers, our first aim is to see if there is a way to stop a case before a person is charged by the police or agency. Once you have been interviewed or become aware that you are being investigated, advice should be obtained to see if it can be stopped before it progresses to charges. More information relating to pre-charge work can be found by following this link.

Where Will the Charges Be Heard?

Both Commonwealth and State matters will commence in the Magistrates’ Court. Some matters will ultimately be determined in the County Court as either a trial before a jury or a plea of guilty, depending on the monetary value associated with the alleged offence and the maximum penalty applicable to that offence.

Pleading Guilty

When facing allegations of money laundering, deciding whether to plead guilty or not guilty is a crucial decision with significant implications. This decision is arrived at following careful and thorough examination of the evidence and any defences or alternative narrative available to you. If you chose to plead guilty, our lawyers would prepare a plea in mitigation on your behalf that persuasively puts all relevant matters including the context to the offending, and your personal circumstances before the Court, in order to obtain the best possible outcome. We will expertly guide you through the process.

Possible Defences

Facing money laundering charges can be daunting, but several defences may be available to challenge these allegations.

Possible defences can include:

  • That you were unaware that the money was obtained through illegal activities
  • There was no intent to launder the money as you did not have an intention to disguise the source of the money
  • You can demonstrate that there was a legitimate source of the funds, and it was obtained by lawful means or can be accounted for
  • There was some sort of procedural or evidentiary error that impacts what evidence can be considered

Some offences are offences of absolute liability. Some offences may also incur civil penalties, separate from criminal penalties and proceedings. Each case is unique, so it’s essential to consult with a legal expert to explore the best strategy based on the specific circumstances of your case.

FAQ About Money Laundering

What must the prosecution prove for Commonwealth money laundering under ss 400.3–400.4?
The allegation involves engaging in transactions that conceal or disguise the nature, location, or source of criminally obtained money. The conduct alleged is the dealing through transactions, and the prosecution case focuses on whether those transactions had the effect of concealing or disguising the criminal origin or attributes of the funds.
Victorian law criminalises dealing with property that is the proceeds of crime, or property that subsequently became an instrument of crime, under ss 194, 195 and 195A of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic). The concept focuses on handling or dealing with property connected to criminal activity, rather than only the original offending that generated the property.
For Commonwealth money laundering offences referred to under ss 400.3 and 400.4 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), penalties can include up to 25 years in prison. Significant fines can also be imposed, which may reach millions of dollars depending on the severity and scale of the crime.
The Confiscation Act 1997 (Vic) provides for confiscation of assets obtained through criminal activity and allows seizure of assets believed to be the proceeds of crime even if the owner has not been convicted of a criminal offence. It includes both civil and criminal forfeiture processes that allow the State to recover assets through legal proceedings.
Both Commonwealth and State matters commence in the Magistrates’ Court. Some matters are ultimately determined in the County Court, either as a jury trial or a plea of guilty. Whether a matter remains in the Magistrates’ Court or proceeds to the County Court depends on the monetary value associated with the alleged offence and the maximum penalty that applies.
AUSTRAC monitors compliance with and enforces the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth). The obligations include maintaining relevant policies, keeping records for 7 years, having periodic audits, conducting customer due diligence, reporting suspicious transactions, and maintaining detailed transaction records.