Make A Booking Call Now

Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property

Table of Contents

Updated 19 February 2026 — reflecting changes in Victorian law and current sentencing data.

What is the offence of Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property?

Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property is a summary offence under s 7(g) of the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic). It criminalises the act of throwing or discharging an object in circumstances where that act creates a real risk of harm to others or results in damage to property, regardless of whether serious injury ultimately occurs.

Key points

  • The prosecution must prove a missile was thrown or discharged, causing injury, danger, or property damage.
  • Covers throwing or discharging a stone, arrow, or other missile toward people or property.
  • As a summary offence, it is primarily heard in the Magistrates’ Court.

The maximum penalty for Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property is 25 penalty units ($5,227.50 — as at 2026–27) or six months imprisonment, or both.

Common defences may include Factual dispute and whether the prosecution can prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

Have you been accused of Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property?

Police Interview

The police will interview you if they suspect you have committed the offence of Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property. Anything you tell police before, during or after the interview can be used by prosecutors against you in Court. They will play your interview in Court and highlight any inconsistencies. Therefore, it is important not to give Police something they can use against you later on.

While you cannot avoid a police interview, you can and should seek advice from an experienced criminal lawyer before speaking to police. One of our defence lawyers will explain to you why you should say ‘no comment’ to protect your position, rather than trying to talk yourself out of the situation or being untruthful in your answers.

Alternatively, your lawyer will let you know whether, in your particular circumstances, it would be in your best interests to answer the questions, but this requires careful thought and planning.

Pleading Not Guilty

You can set your matter down for a contested hearing in the Magistrates’ Court if you deny the allegation of Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property. One of our experienced defence lawyers can prepare a defence strategy for you to increase your chances of an acquittal or the charge being withdrawn by prosecutors.

If you are contesting the charge of Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property, you should engage an experienced criminal lawyer at an early stage of proceedings to represent your interests. Your lawyer will be skilled at analysing the evidence, requesting disclosure material and will provide you with expert legal advice about how to best prepare your defence.

Pleading Guilty

You may intend to plead guilty to Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property. Perhaps the offence happened on the spur of the moment, or there was a very good explanation for why you acted in the way that you did. Whatever your reason, we will listen to your explanation and form it into a submission in mitigation.

One of our experienced criminal lawyer will carefully listen to you to fully understand your story. Your lawyer will then thoroughly prepare your case with the appropriate supporting materials and assist you to achieve the best possible penalty.

Sentencing

Sentencing in the Magistrates’ Courts of Australia

Magistrates court sentencing pie chart

Source: Sentencing Advisory Council of Victoria (SACStat), Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic) s 7(g) — 1,103 charges across 1,004 cases, Magistrates’ Court, 1 July 2020 – 30 June 2023.

Sentencing outcome%
Adjourned Undertaking30.3%
Fine22.0%
Imprisonment24.3%
Community Correction Order19.3%
Discharge/Dismissal3.8%
Other0.3%

These figures show there is a real risk of imprisonment, but it is not inevitable. The sentence ultimately depends on the specific circumstances of the offence, your personal history, and the strength of the material presented on your behalf.

Which court will the case be heard in?

As a summary offence, any summons for this charge will primarily be handled by the Magistrates’ Court.

What is the legal definition of Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property?

Any person who throws or discharges a stone arrow or other missile to the injury of or danger to any person or damage to any property shall be guilty of an offence.

Penalty: 25 penalty units or imprisonment for six months or both.

Examples of Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property

  • An argument occurs at a sporting match between the supporters of opposition clubs. This results in a fight where objects are thrown from one group to the other.
  • You are with a group of friends and throw an object which hits a vehicle. There are people nearby and the vehicle is damaged.

Legislation

This offence is governed by section 7(g) of the Summary Offences Act 1966.

Elements of the offence

The prosecution must prove:

  • That the accused threw or discharged a stone arrow or other missile; and
  • As a result of this action, caused the injury of, or danger to any person or damage to any property.

Defences

Criminal defences that are used in response to this charge are normally around factual dispute and whether the Prosecution can prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

Questions in cases like this

  • I was just part of the group, can I still be charged with this?
  • How was someone placed in danger?
  • What evidence shows that I was involved in this incident?

Maximum penalty and court that deals with this charge

The offence of Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property (s7(g) of the Summary Offences Act 1966) carries a fine of 25 penalty units ($5,227.50 — as at 2026–27), six months imprisonment or both in more significant cases.

Case studies related to Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property

Other important resources

FAQs for Discharge Missile to Endanger Person or Property

The offence covers throwing or discharging a stone, arrow, or other object in circumstances where a person is injured, placed in danger, or property is damaged. The focus is on the act of discharging the object and the resulting risk, injury, or damage, not on whether serious harm was intended.
No. The offence can be made out if a person is put in danger, even if no physical injury occurs. Damage to property alone can also be sufficient, provided the missile was thrown or discharged in circumstances covered by the offence.
The prosecution must prove that the accused threw or discharged a stone, arrow, or other missile, and that this act resulted in injury to a person, danger to a person, or damage to property. Both the conduct and the outcome must be established beyond reasonable doubt.
Common issues include whether the accused was the person who discharged the object, whether the conduct placed someone in danger, and whether any damage or risk can be linked to the alleged act. Cases often turn on factual dispute and the strength of the prosecution evidence.
Bail can usually be sought if charged with discharge missile to endanger person or property. Success depends on the seriousness of the charge and your personal circumstances. Lawyers prepare strong bail applications to maximise release chances.
The length of a discharge missile to endanger person or property case in Victoria depends on its complexity and whether it goes to trial. Cases may last months or longer, especially if contested in higher courts.
Yes, Doogue + George regularly represent clients charged with discharge missile to endanger person or property in Melbourne and regional courts. Our team provides expert defence and tailored strategies.