Possessing Child Pornography

This case involved charges of possessing child pornography and producing child pornography/downloading child pornography. The allegation was that the defendant had downloaded images and that they amounted to child pornography (i.e. that the girls depicted were under 18 years old).

Josh Taaffe represented our client at the Bairnsdale Magistrates’ Court.

The Court accepted that there was a doubt as to the age of the girls in the photographs and that where there is a doubt the charges must be dismissed. The defendant would have been placed on the sex offenders Register as well as other penalties and in the circumstances it was a very rewarding result.


Josh TaaffeJosh Taaffe

Josh has extensive experience in indictable crime including sex offences, assaults & drug matters.

As an instructing solicitor Josh has specialised in handling complex matters, such as murder and terrorism trials, including State and Commonwealth Supreme Court trials. Josh is an Accredited Criminal Law Specialist.

Visit Josh’s profile to read more about his background and experience.

DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 25/02/2013