Assault and Driving Charges – Fine, Licence Cancelled, Assault Charges Withdrawn

Our client was driving and pulled up at lights. There were two cyclists side by side who were taking up the lane. Our client tooted at them to indicate that they should be one deep so that he could drive past. There were some disputes about what the gesticulation was by the cyclist who turned around. Lights changed and they set off. Our client tried to merge to the right and clipped one of the cyclists and, in the process, ran over his foot. The cyclist suffered significant injury and loss of work time.

The Police charged our client with reckless endangerment, having foreseen that his conduct might create an appreciable risk. He was also charged with a number of causing injury charges which are assault charges involving the client having been aware of the probable consequences of what he did.

Overall, our client faced the following charges:

Bill Doogue represented our client at the Frankston Magistrates’ Court.

The Police agreed to withdraw 5 charges and proceed with the drive in a manner dangerous by itself. A plea was entered to this charge and our client understood that he had to lose his licence. This was cancelled for 6 months and he was also fined $1000 to be paid until a later date.


Bill DoogueBill Doogue

Bill has been an Accredited Criminal Law Specialist for over 17 years and a criminal defence lawyer for over 25 years.

Bill specialises in defending corporate crime cases and defending serious sexual offences charges. Bill has expertly and successfully defended high profile, high-pressure cases and is highly respected by the Courts, police and his peers. Bill runs the Melbourne office and enjoys his involvement in advising on the higher level strategy that should be used to defend cases.

Visit Bill's Melbourne criminal lawyer profile to read more about his background and experience. You can also follow him on Twitter.

DISCLAIMER: This is a real case study of an actual case from our files. Details pertaining to the client have been changed to protect their privacy. The sentence imposed and the charge have not been altered. These case studies are published to demonstrate real outcomes and give an indication of possible tariffs in Court. We do not guarantee a similar case on these charges will get the same result. Please note that we post results at our discretion, therefore while many case studies are average results, others are notable for their exceptional outcomes. PUBLISHED 25/02/2013