White Collar Crime Topics Menu
Doogue & O'Brien Testimonials
"I don't think I could have coped if I lost my trial. The preparation you put in was amazing."
Gary F
"I was proud that we stood up and fought the charges. I would have lost everything if I had been found guilty."
Peter L
"Your compassion during my time of need was outstanding. Many thanks."
Cameron A
"Lots of people kept telling me I should plead guilty except for your firm. You were right."
Lee W
"Everyone was judging me except for you. That support really helped me get through a terrible time."
John A
VIC LAW Directors Publishing False Statements
VIC LAW Directors Publishing False Statements
What the Law states - Directors Publishing False Statements
Section 176 of the Crimes Act states:
Whosoever, being a director, or officer, of any body corporate, or public company, makes, circulates, or publishes, or concurs in making, circulating, or publishing, any written statement, or account, which he or she knows to be false in any material particular, with intent to deceive, or defraud, any member, shareholder, or creditor, of such body corporate, or company, or with intent to induce any person to become a shareholder, or partner therein, or to intrust, or advance, any property to such body corporate, or company, or to enter into any security for the benefit thereof, shall be liable to imprisonment for 10 years.
Maximum Penalty for the charge of Directors Publishing False Statements
The Maximum penalty for the offence of Directors Publishing False Statements is 10 years imprisonment.
What the Prosecution must prove - Directors Publishing False Statements
In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt.
1. The accused was a director or officer of the company named.
2. Whilst in that position, the accused made, circulated or published (or concurred in such action).
3. A written statement relating to the affairs of the company.
4. Which was false in a material particular.
5. With intent to deceive (and defraud) the person named.
6. The accused well knew of the falsity of the statement.
It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence.
Possible Defences - Directors Publishing False Statements
Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to
1. Duress
2. Necessity
Which court will hear the charge of Directors Publishing False Statements
This matter is a Table 1 offence which means that either the DPP or an accused can elect to have the matter dealt with in the District Court. If no election is made it will be dealt with in the Local Court.
