Please upgrade your web browser as Internet Explorer 6 is no longer supported. Upgrade to IE8 or Install Firefox.

Website designed and optimised by mini_logo.png, 6.8kB

blackBar.jpg, 320B

White Collar Crime Topics Menu

blackBar.jpg, 320B

Doogue & O'Brien Testimonials

"I don't think I could have coped if I lost my trial. The preparation you put in was amazing."

Gary F

"I was proud that we stood up and fought the charges. I would have lost everything if I had been found guilty."

Peter L

"Your compassion during my time of need was outstanding. Many thanks."

Cameron A

"Lots of people kept telling me I should plead guilty except for your firm. You were right."

Lee W

"Everyone was judging me except for you. That support really helped me get through a terrible time."

John A

VIC LAW Director Omitting Certain Entries

BlackMenuBar.jpg, 340B

Written by
Bill Doogue
Criminal Defence Lawyer

Contact Bill Doogue 

03 9670 5111


Commonwealth Offences - Federal
The Law - Director Omitting Certain Entries

What the Law states - Director Omitting Certain Entries


Section 174 of the Crimes Act states:

Whosoever, being a director, or officer of any body corporate, or public company, receives, or possesses himself or herself, of any of the property of such body corporate, or company, otherwise than in payment of a just debt, and, with intent to defraud, omits to make, or direct to be made, a true and sufficient entry thereof in the books, or accounts, of such body corporate, or company, shall be liable to imprisonment for 10 years.

Maximum Penalty in Victoria


The Maximum penalty for the offence of Directors etc omitting certain entries is ten years imprisonment.

What the Prosecution must prove - Director Omitting Certain Entries - Vic


In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt.

1. The accused was a director or officer of a company.
2. As such, he or she received or came into possession of the company’s property.
3. He or she omitted to make a true and sufficient entry thereof in the company’s books.
4. With intent to defraud.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence.

Possible Defences - Director Omitting Certain Entries


Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to

1. Duress
2. Necessity
3. Intoxication

Which court will hear the charge of Director Omitting Certain Entries


This matter is a Table 1 offence which means that either the DPP or an accused can elect to have the matter dealt with in the District Court. If no election is made it will be dealt with in the Local Court.
Article published on 01/09/2009. To check if any changes to the law please discuss with one of our lawyers.
blackBar.jpg, 320B