Criminal Lawyers Melbourne

White Collar Crime Topics Menu

Criminal Lawyers Melbourne

Recent Articles

Red Light Camera - Not Guilty
Case study, by VIC criminal lawyers.
Sexual Offences - Successful appeal against conviction
Case study, by VIC criminal lawyers.
Aggravated Burglary and assault charges - Good behaviour bondhrges
Case study, by VIC criminal lawyers.
Assault - Charges withdrawn
Case study, by VIC criminal lawyers.
Obtaining property by deception - Suspended Sentence
Case study, by VIC criminal lawyers.
Rape - Discharged at Committal
Case study, by VIC criminal lawyers.
Unlawful Assault - Charges Dismissed
Case study, by VIC criminal lawyers.
Criminal Lawyers Melbourne

Doogue & O'Brien Testimonials

"I don't think I could have coped if I lost my trial. The preparation you put in was amazing."

Gary F

"I was proud that we stood up and fought the charges. I would have lost everything if I had been found guilty."

Peter L

"Your compassion during my time of need was outstanding. Many thanks."

Cameron A

"Lots of people kept telling me I should plead guilty except for your firm. You were right."

Lee W

"Everyone was judging me except for you. That support really helped me get through a terrible time."

John A

Destruction of evidence

Criminal Lawyers Melbourne
ADLA member for - VIC

Written by
Kristina Kothrakis
Criminal Defence Lawyer


Evidence - VIC
The Law - Destruction of evidence

What the Law states - Destruction of evidence


Crimes Act 1958 - SECT 254

Destruction of evidence

254. Destruction of evidence

(1) A person who-

(a) knows that a document or other thing of any kind is, or is reasonably likely to be, required in evidence in a legal proceeding; and

(b) either-

(i) destroys or conceals it or renders it illegible, undecipherable or incapable of identification; or

(ii) expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorises or permits another person to destroy or conceal it or render it illegible, undecipherable or incapable of identification and that other person does so; and

(c) acts as described in paragraph (b) with the intention of preventing it from being used in evidence in a legal proceeding-

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to level 6 imprisonment (5 years maximum) or a level 6 fine or both. Notes 1. Document is defined in section 38 of the Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984. 2. The maximum fine that may be imposed on a body corporate found guilty of an offence against this section is 3000 penalty units: see Sentencing Act 1991 s. 113D.

(2) This section applies with respect to a legal proceeding, whether the proceeding is one that is in progress or is to be, or may be, commenced in the future.

Maximum Penalty in Victoria



5 years / 3000 penalty units

What the Prosecution must prove - Destruction of evidence - Vic


1. The accused has knowledge that a document is, or is likely to be required in a legal proceeding

2. The accused destroys or conceals it, or reders it incapable of identification- or

3. Authorises another person to destroy, conceal or render it incapable of indentification.

4. The accused does so with the intention of preventing it from being used in evidence in a legal proceeding.

Possible Defences - Destruction of evidence


1. Lack of knowlegde

2. Lack of intent

3. Factual dispute

Which court will hear the charge of Destruction of evidence


County Court

Article published on 09/01/2009. To check if any changes to the law please discuss with one of our lawyers.
Criminal Lawyers Melbourne
 Speak to a Lawyer Eamil us your question Book now Request a quote


Level 5/221 Queen St Melbourne, Victoria (03) 9670 5111
Broadmeadows (03) 9351 1455       Heidelberg (03) 9458 3700

Criminal Lawyers Melbourne Criminal Lawyers Melbourne